IE9 vs Firefox 4 vs Chrome 10
The trio on the screen “chrome” to a minimum and did not look bad. From a purely aesthetic point of IE9 seems most at home, but can quickly become confusing with all on one line.
years of gross ugliness of the new interface is great progress, and this is a refined version has begun to grow with us. At least it’s a PC. By default Mac interface does not really work.
Chrome 10 was the slowest in our test PC that runs through the benchmark average of 346.0ms SunSpider, Firefox, reached an average of 308.5 4. IE9 was marginal, however, an average 288.8ms.
Let’s try another: the version 6 of the V8, Google’s own benchmark suite. You suspect that Google will do well here, and. Larger numbers are better, and reach Chrome 7101 compared with 3269 and 2053 for Firefox IE9.
So far, so meh – “Google browser does not benchmark well in Google” is not a surprise – but it shows how the differences between browsers disappear: 2008 Chrome would routinely score ten times more than Firefox and IE do not even feature.
One more? Mozilla gives the Kraken, a very demanding tasks a web application based on the SunSpider set to go. Firefox ms flows through a large test suite, and 9224 ms 19 IE9 136th Mozilla Firefox is the best browser Mozilla benchmarks “shocking Nope: Chrome has been mentioned in passing come, ms in 8794th
It is clear that Browser is optimized for the chosen benchmark, but what true stories? From Enter to fully loaded Tech Radar FrontPage 20Mbps DSL connection, it takes 4 seconds Chrome, Firefox, and five of nine (no pages are cached, and we had no extensions, add-ons or other goodies installed or on the site ) prevent.
Fark.com lasted four seconds, Firefox, Chrome took four and six in IE online banking login page two seconds in Chrome, Firefox and IE two, three.
Let’s try something more challenging. Shop and starts to play, Radiohead video on YouTube Lotus Flower was three seconds in Firefox, IE of three and four Chrome. Open the file and edit it after he prepared to my Google Docs Firefox took about four seconds, four and six IE9 Chrome.
There is clearly a model. Firefox and Chrome are usually neck and neck in daily performance and IE9 trailing close behind. However, there really is not much to it – and are in most cases the ads, the bits, which is time consuming and display pages of text, navigation elements and form fields on almost immediately.
Stability and Standards:
Acid 3 test, uh, scratch test standards, and if you had given us a few years ago said we would get to see so burned 95/100 would be a witch. But it is a black and white (and yellow, and …).
Firefox is set before 97/100 and Chrome gives the teacher an apple and get a gold star to the perfect 100/100 score.
Video, of course, is notorious for Crasher browser, so it’s nice to share a chrome and IE9 opportunity, individual tabs in different processes. This is to prevent bad plug-in clearing the entire browser session, and it is easy to kill little.
Firefox has the edge here: it opened pinnable App Tabs gorge, such as email and web applications, but the Groups tab is easy to organize openly to large collections of pages.
IE9 not sync at all, but allows you to pages about Windows 7 task bar pin, as if the applications and then drag the tab snap it to display alongside the other. You also get the correct download manager to Firefox since 1957.
There is also a new chrome-Style Tab and Chrome-style search for the address field. Firefox to keep the two box approach, where the Awesome Bar URL History, and a separate search box – though confusing, Awesome Bar is not for too much.
SunSpider seemed like the slowest real use of the word. It’s a really nice browser, however, and if you have a user who does not really interfere with handling or extensions, you will be completely satisfied. It is not just a little behind its competitors in real speed, but a decent PC there is not much of it.